LEARN WITH A CLEAR DIRECTION
Understand local inference, LiteRT-LM model delivery, quantization, memory budgets and hardware benchmarking.
Understand local inference, LiteRT-LM model delivery, quantization, memory budgets and hardware benchmarking. Follow six teaching modules, each with a practical assignment, then combine the skills in the final project. Start with the introduction even if the tools are familiar: it defines the scope and boundaries of the path.
Self-paced. Complete each exercise and use its checkpoint before moving to the next module. Revisit any prerequisite you cannot yet demonstrate.
THE CURRICULUM
13 lessons across 7 modules. Open a module to explore its lessons and practical work.
Understand the deployment responsibilities that move into the app.
Ready to move on when: You can name the assets and runtime assumptions required for offline operation.
Choose a model that fits the task and the device budget.
Ready to move on when: The selected artifact fits both the device budget and the task acceptance criteria.
Treat model assets as versioned application dependencies.
Ready to move on when: Only a fully verified package becomes the active model.
Keep expensive local work away from the UI thread.
Ready to move on when: Your UI remains responsive and ownership of native resources is unambiguous.
Benchmark the actual deployment configuration.
Ready to move on when: Your performance claims include device, backend, model and workload.
Ship model changes with the discipline of software releases.
Ready to move on when: You can roll back a model independently from ordinary user documents.
Build an offline document classifier with a versioned model package, measured resource use and recovery from corrupted downloads.
Ready to move on when: Demonstrate every acceptance criterion and explain the tradeoffs without relying on the lesson text.
PROVE YOUR SKILLS
Use the final review rubric to identify gaps. Lesson completion tracks study progress; readiness comes from independently demonstrating the work.
Open the portfolio review rubric →